A new slant on the Screw Cap / Cork Debate

I was having a discussion today with a well known former winemaker of a very well known Australian Wine Company, and we both agreed to disagree on the advantages and disadvantages of screw cap closures versus traditional cork. The wine media and consequently the wine consumer in general have overwhelmingly accepted screw cap as the alternative closure and to some extent have gone overboard, where many distributors and marketers do not want to deal with wines that are still in cork.

There is such a wave toward screw cap, that even red wines that have been made to age are having difficulties if they are not in screw cap. The wine media have alot to answer for, but also winemakers have embraced the concept of screwcap that prevents cork taint, and seal the bottle securely. However it has also been argued that wines under screw cap can develop “burnt match” type characters and be overly sulphidic , a function of the fact that they do not breath as well as traditional cork. One of the major problems associated with cork, apart from cork taint, is random oxidation, caused by corks loosing integrity.

However, the interesting observation that this particular winemaker made was quite intriguing. He was observing a bottling of Sauvignon Blanc under cork one day, and they had the vacuum filler turned up quite high, ensuring a strong vacuum was present inside the bottle once filled, to remove any air in the neck of the bottle. He noticed in a bottle after corking that an air bubble was trapped and slowly moving from the top of the bottle between the cork and glass, toward the wine, under vacuum. So essentially, the process they were employing to prevent oxidation of the wine, was in fact considerably increasing the risk.

It empahsises the fact that no matter how well in theory a process or system works during winemaking, it’s the implementation that makes the difference.

For the record, The Wine Blokes are ambivalent to the pros and cons of cork versus screw cap, and is entirely up to the winemaker. Some styles certainly benefit from screwcap, and some certainly benefit from cork. You can be sure though that will polarize winemakers, marketers, and consumers alike for years to come, or at least until a new, cool, fad closure comes onto the market.

Take Part in the Great Cork Debate

Have your say! Let us know once and for all which is the best option: cork or screwcap (we’ve included synthetic corks as an alternative to traditional corks for those of us who love the corkscrew too much to let it go just yet!).

[poll id=”2“]

Let us know what you chose and why in the comments box. Its all fun - there is no right or wrong answer.

About the Author

Jono

Jono has been involved in the wine industry since he was quite young. His parents had a small vineyard and winery in the Gippsland region of Victoria, Australia, and spent plenty of school holidays working in the vineyard and winery. He completed a Bachelor of Agricultural Science (Oenology) from the University of Adelaide (formely the Roseworthy Agricultural College). He also holds a Post Graduate Degree in Business Management from Monash University. His wine industry experience include working as a winemaker for Petaluma in the Adelaide Hills under the legendary Brian Croser. He was then sent to Smithbrook in the Pemberton region of Western Australia, then owned by Petaluma. He spent 6 years at Smithbrook managing the vineyard and winery, and during that time also completed a vintage at Chateau Carsin in Bordeaux. The two years leading into 2008, he traveled the world with his partner sampling the worlds best wines, and also fulfilling his other passion of equestrian competition.

6 Responses to “ A new slant on the Screw Cap / Cork Debate ”

  1. Good points, well made. I just wonder where synthetic corks fit in with all this? Are they the same, better or worse than old fashioned cork, in your opinion? Are they better or worse than screwcaps? This debate will go on forever: some people don’t like change; some people don’t have corkscrews…

  2. For my part, I voted for the traditional cork. While I admit the screwcap is often much easier for the drinker (we moved house recently and were crying out for a screwtop when I discovered I’d not get a cork screw handy!), you simply cannot beat the sensuous experience of pulling a cork from a fresh bottle of fine wine.

    Just screwing the top off doesn’t feel the same - this perhaps comes from the view that one shouldn’t just drink wine: revere it!

    I guess you might call me a traditionalist. Of course, it does depend on the age of the wine, and how long you’re going to keep it.

  3. As always, champagne is the best of everything; taste, hangover, and corkscrew. All the ease of a screwtop with all the maturation benefits of traditional cork - and you get the staisfying “pop”.

  4. My preference is for screwcap- there is nothing worse than going out to dinner with a special wine you are keen to try and it is corked!!!!

  5. I like real corks, plastic corks, screwtops, and the new Andrew Peace Australian Save The World carton, as long as the wine is good…

    Screwtops keep wine fresh, if you don’t drink it all at once (and who doesn’t?!)

    The new carton can go in our local recycling bin, as can plastic corks and glass bottles. Real corks, I guess recycling would mean threading them on strings to put round your hat in case global warming brings flies as many in UK as in Oz!!

    I just like wine…!!!

  6. […] a similar debate to the one over the use of screw-tops and synthetic corks over cork-bark stoppers, wine experts and avid drinkers are raising eyebrows over the idea of drinking from these cartons […]

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <strong>